JL/JLU Wrangler 2.0L Turbo Gets 368 HP (Source: FCA docs to NHTSA)!

  1. Bearded_Dragon

    Bearded_Dragon Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    NA
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2017
    Location:
    FL
    Posts:
    121
    Liked:
    50
    #1 Oct 5, 2017
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 24, 2017
    Admin Update: October 10

    In FCA's latest filing to the NHTSA, the power output figure for the JL Wrangler's 2.0L Turbo I4 is now listed as "Not Rated." Whether this means the 368 HP figure is incorrect is not yet known, but we will keep an eye on further submissions.

    wrangler-turbo.jpg



    Admin Edit:

    From documents submitted from FCA to NHTSA.
    Source: https://vpic.nhtsa.dot.gov/mid/home/displayfile/39499 (also via The Truth About Cars)

    This is a 2018 Model Year FCA US MPV/Truck VIN Decoder Document that FCA submitted to the NHTSA showing initial release for the 2018 Jeep Wrangler (and other vehicles).

    Two engine initial launch:
    • 3.6L V6 - 285 horsepower
    • 2.0L Turbo I4 - 368 horsepower
    As we’ve reported, and this document now supports, the updated Pentastar 3.6L V6 will be the base engine and we now know horsepower will remain unchanged at 285 horsepower.

    The document also shows the new Wrangler will be launched initially only with the 4-door JLU offering, although our JL production timeline indicates the 2-door will arrive shortly after (around Feb 2018).

    2018-JL-Wrangler-V6-Horsepower-1.png 2018-JL-Wrangler-V6-Horsepower-2.png 2018-JL-Wrangler-V6-Horsepower-3.png 2018-JL-Wrangler-V6-Horsepower-4.png
     
    Vegas_Sirk, Ahmed, BORN2BLEED and 4 others like this.
  2. Billy

    Billy Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    1997 TJ, 2008 WK CRD
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2016
    Location:
    Bend, OR
    Posts:
    980
    Liked:
    578
    Garage Profiles:
    1
    Whoa. Game changer.
     
    Ahmed and digitalbliss like this.
  3. Jeeptimus Prime

    Jeeptimus Prime Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Bryant
    Vehicle(s):
    2016 JKU
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2017
    Location:
    NorCal
    Posts:
    124
    Liked:
    77
    #3 Oct 5, 2017
    Last edited: Oct 6, 2017
    Hope it isn't a typo! :facepalm:
     
  4. DanW

    DanW Well-Known Member

    First Name:
    Dan
    Vehicle(s):
    1999 Mercedes E430 Sport, 2002 Ford F150 King Ranch Supercrew FX4, 2008 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon, 2015 Ford Transit 350 van.
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2017
    Location:
    Danville, Indiana
    Posts:
    870
    Liked:
    443
    Garage Profiles:
    2
    I'd like to see the torque number on that 2.0. I've wished I could have the 3.5 Ecoboost from my Ford Transit in my JK. It has 300hp and 400lb of torque, and moves the big 15 passenger van with authority, while getting good fuel economy. This 2.0 sounds even meaner. Man, I wish they'd offer the 6 speed with it, if it really puts up that kind of hp. I'd expect torque to be better than 300lbs, and maybe even push 400. That would be a BEAST and would make me reconsider my current favorite V6/manual.
     
    UN4GTBL, James and VegasGT like this.
  5. OP
    Bearded_Dragon

    Bearded_Dragon Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    NA
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2017
    Location:
    FL
    Posts:
    121
    Liked:
    50
    #5 Oct 5, 2017
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2017
    I'm actually really excited about the 2.0 if this is legit. The torque will be in the low-mid 300 range, I'm thinking anyways.

    Also, thanks to (I'm assuming) Administrator for adding info to my post.
     
    UN4GTBL likes this.
  6. MotorMan

    MotorMan Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    jeep
    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2017
    Location:
    us
    Posts:
    426
    Liked:
    307
    Oh shit..
     
    The Mad Duck likes this.
  7. CorpCow

    CorpCow Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    Ram 1500 Quad Cab
    Joined:
    May 18, 2016
    Location:
    Austin
    Posts:
    142
    Liked:
    51
    Wow that's incredible. I was expecting the 2.0 to be potentially less than the 3.6. Game changer for sure.
     
    UN4GTBL likes this.
  8. OP
    Bearded_Dragon

    Bearded_Dragon Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    NA
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2017
    Location:
    FL
    Posts:
    121
    Liked:
    50
    No doubt it would be a beast. I'm sure the engineers will make low end torque a priority as well.
     
    UN4GTBL likes this.
  9. wooderson

    wooderson Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    F-150
    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2017
    Location:
    California
    Posts:
    45
    Liked:
    22
    Hell to the yeah !!!
     
  10. SeaJay

    SeaJay Active Member

    First Name:
    Steve
    Vehicle(s):
    1966 CJ5, 1976 CJ5, 1999 TJ, 2012 JK
    Joined:
    May 17, 2017
    Location:
    USA
    Posts:
    25
    Liked:
    41
    ???? Seriously? Man, people will be lowering their Wranglers, bolting on body kits and adding spoilers with that kind of hp lol. (Just kidding, just kidding...)
    Have to rethink my priorities now...
     
    DarkWater, The Mad Duck and UN4GTBL like this.
  11. MotorMan

    MotorMan Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    jeep
    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2017
    Location:
    us
    Posts:
    426
    Liked:
    307
    For some scale: 68 more horespower than base Porshe Boxster 718 engine. 18 more horsepower than the most powerful 718 engine. It will be only 7 horsepower behind the most powerful 4 cylinder engine in a production car (Mercedes-AMG GLA 45).
     
    UN4GTBL and Goes like this.
  12. word302

    word302 Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    JLU
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2017
    Location:
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts:
    219
    Liked:
    126
    Don't forget the improved power/weight ratio as I assume this will be much lighter than the V6.
     
  13. Work

    Work Active Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2014 JK Willys Wheeler Granite Crystal
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2016
    Location:
    Jax
    Posts:
    35
    Liked:
    43
    That's huge news
     
  14. foo.c

    foo.c Well-Known Member

    Vehicle(s):
    2017 Ford Raptor, 1997 Lexus LX450
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2017
    Location:
    127.0.0.1
    Posts:
    60
    Liked:
    28
    No way. That thing must be running 30 psi out of 2 liters.
     
    BillyHW likes this.
  15. VegasGT

    VegasGT Active Member

    First Name:
    Richard
    Vehicle(s):
    Ford Mustang GT
    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2017
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Posts:
    31
    Liked:
    36
    MY GOD! This has thrown my build all off now. I don't know what I'm going to do!
     
    UN4GTBL and SeaJay like this.
Loading...

Share This Page