DadJokes
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Daniel
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2019
- Threads
- 76
- Messages
- 2,503
- Reaction score
- 2,122
- Location
- Indiana
- Website
- www.youtube.com
- Vehicle(s)
- Sahara
Bans? That may be a goal but there will be negatives and environmental/habitat consequences changing the world’s infrastructure from fuel driven to alternative fuel/multi source “Free” energy. It seems the agenda has taken a life of its own and grows to justify its existence. JMO. The best way to minimize habitat and environmental impact (assuming no 3 mile island type incident) would be as many nuclear power plants as needed. I’d prefer that over ugly ass windmills and solar panels that, if enough to actually meet demand and replace Fossil fuel, would cover wide swaths off land and ruin habitats and eliminate environment. What happened to the green types/conservationists? The tree people? It’s seems they’ve been silenced. There needs to be balance. The climate has always changed. Always will until the end. How much is the fault of humankind?
Sponsored