M0ondogy
Well-Known Member
It sounds like we are saying the same thing and thinking the same way, but just coming to a different conclusion.I don't see it that way at all. What it boils down to is capability.
Most vehicles are not capable of traversing large boulders without breaking things. Vehicles that can are deemed more capable.
But it's not simply "rockcrawling". I've had the good fortune to wheel over a lot of our country...and in just about any area, you can find some really nasty hillclimbs, v-notched ruts, sandstone ledges, deep mud holes and the like that are going to require either a complete willingness to ignore occupant safety, vehicle longevity and environmental impact or good equipment like lockers, 4:1, etc. (factory offered or aftermarket) to get through those types of trails. For some reason, everyone thinks lockers are just for rockcrawling...anyone who's wheeled the more extreme end of the trail ride spectrum knows they aren't limited to that one application.
Said it before, but it bears repeating...."overlanding" in the US is really just car camping for the most part. There's nothing particularly technical or difficult about it. You're traveling long distances on either graded roads or somewhat maintained (the level of maintenance is debatable) two tracks. Just about any 4wd vehicle (even with open diffs) could make most of these roads and water crossings are usually biggest obstacles encountered. Running out of fuel or losing a tire are generally the biggest concerns. I honestly don't think a Jeep is a very good vehicle for that purpose...there are far better, more reliable options out there if that's your type of 4wheeling.
I guess without knowing the full story on the Defender, to me, it looks like the slight step down in general capability from the wrangler isn't that bad considering the bump in luxury. Especially for how much the Rubicon retails for.
Sponsored