reallynervous
Well-Known Member
Yeah I guess it is, especially since you're still scheduled to get the Jeep...let me know how much you enjoy driving it...oh wait!You say shady, I say 100% legal. Entitled to your opinion.
Sponsored
Yeah I guess it is, especially since you're still scheduled to get the Jeep...let me know how much you enjoy driving it...oh wait!You say shady, I say 100% legal. Entitled to your opinion.
So is declaring bankruptcy and walking away from debt incurred from reckless spending. That doesn't make it right...You say shady, I say 100% legal. Entitled to your opinion.
Yeah, my order went thru with no problem. Must be cuz I used my actual address. Oh and my state has no sales tax ?Well, you did get out of paying vehicle taxes!
You tried something shady and it didn't work.
Just 'cos many do it doesn't make it less shady.
The 'C' in LLC means it isn't a sale to an individual.
The following video explains it all
Did you see the actual communication from Stallantis to the dealer(s) regarding this policy change? Who now gets your order?The dealer represents the manufacturer.
I'm telling you what the dealer told me. There was no mention whatsoever of anything tax-related, only that Jeep sees the address as "fleet" and canceled because of that. Even if I lived at that address they still would've canceled it.
The dealer read the email to me over the phone, it mirrored what he said that Jeep consider the address a "fleet" address and the order is canceled. He was trying to see if they'd let me change the address to my personal one but Jeep already canceled it.Did you see the actual communication from Stallantis to the dealer(s) regarding this policy change? Who now gets your order?
Did you have a VIN? In what status was your order (D, D-1, etc.)?
So Stallantis communicated a canceled order through email to the dealership or was this an official communication to all dealers? I’ve purchased so many cars over the years, that this is either missing info, or just not adding up. Typically when manufacturers have a policy such as this or an official policy change, they send an official communication to all dealers outlining said policy change.The dealer read the email to me over the phone, it mirrored what he said that Jeep consider the address a "fleet" address and the order is canceled. He was trying to see if they'd let me change the address to my personal one but Jeep already canceled it.
I've had a VIN for 3 months. I'm not too familiar with the order status codes but it didn't have a scheduled build date yet.
It is my understanding that Jeep does not have a written policy on this (yet) and they wrote the email specific to the VIN, and I assume to all other impacted VINs. I asked the dealer if they had anything official in writing from Jeep about the policy and they said no. I don't think it matters much at this point since the order is already canceled and I'd have to start over again from scratch.So Stallantis communicated a canceled order through email to the dealership or was this an official communication to all dealers? I’ve purchased so many cars over the years, that this is either missing info, or just not adding up. Typically when manufacturers have a policy such as this or an official policy change, they send an official communication to all dealers outlining said policy change.
I would request the dealer produce the official communication outlining this policy, not read it to me over the phone.
From whom did the email originate? Will the dealer provide you with said email?It is my understanding that Jeep does not have a written policy on this (yet) and they wrote the email specific to the VIN, and I assume to all other impacted VINs. I asked the dealer if they had anything official in writing from Jeep about the policy and they said no. I don't think it matters much at this point since the order is already canceled and I'd have to start over again from scratch.
LOL. As shown by legal precedent, in your home state of Nevada, what you are doing is, in fact, 100% NOT legal (https://tax.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/ta...Lambeth - Settlement Agreement - redacted.pdf)You say shady, I say 100% legal. Entitled to your opinion.
Ok lawyer buddy. This has been contested before and the plaintiff won the case. The link above is for a settlement where the plaintiff didn’t want to fight it.LOL. As shown by legal precedent, in your home state of Nevada, what you are doing is, in fact, 100% NOT legal (https://tax.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/taxnvgov/Content/Boards/Nevada_Tax_Commission_Forms/Rondi Lambeth - Settlement Agreement - redacted.pdf)
It is absolutely 100% legal for Montana to offer you an LLC (by Montana's state law) and it is 100% legal for you to register a Montana LLC (due to interstate commerce laws). It is, however, 100% NOT legal for you to use that LLC to purchase a vehicle in Nevada using that Montana LLC to avoid paying Nevada taxes (by Nevada's state law). Again, your home state has shown that they will absolutely enforce their laws against tax evasion, which is 100% what you were doing.