viper88
Well-Known Member
I agree the JL has had it's fair share of initial OQ issues. In fairness most new vehicles do. Some car companies more than others. We all know where FCA products are on all QC surveys. Some early JLs had frame welds and steering issues. My '19 JLR did not have those issues but it had a few other issues. Some resolved and some not.Not all JL Wranglers had steering problems but a lot sure did. I'd take a top that has defects over steering issues. While there aren't a lot on the road currently, there are Bronco's out there with zero problems other than a top that will eventually be replaced. Maybe Jeep should have fixed the wandering steering on the JL before releasing them? It's all perspective I guess.
I would not take delivery if I were a customer. Who knows how long a real solution will take. Webesto built a brand new factory from the ground up in MI just for the Bronco hard tops. They should have had good tops by now. There is more to the story. I can see Ford blaming Webesto and Webesto blaming Ford.I like this idea but aren't thousands of vehicles awaiting a hard top rather than customers getting a soft top? I don't think thousands of customers would take their Bronco (I know I wouldn't) with this aftermarket soft top instead of getting a defective hard top. I'd rather take delivery with a defective hard top and wait on a replacement down the road. I don't personally agree with Ford's decision to hold all the hard tops now at this point with all of the waiting orders. It could be much more costly than 10-12 million when factoring in the cost of these tops AND the labor associated with installing and then eventually removing the soft tops.
Sponsored
Last edited: