okie dokie
Well-Known Member
Wow this thread delivers!!
Sponsored
I've owned my JLR with a manual for about a month and 1250 miles. My engine starts almost instantaneously as soon as my foot touches the clutch pedal. The engine is fully started well before I get from neutral to first gear.I've experienced an issue with ESS on my manual transmission where I've depressed the clutch, put it in first gear, and tried to go without the engine turning back on. So I've had to [quickly] put it back into neutral, take my foot off the clutch, and depress the break and start the process over in order for the engine to turn back on. This has happened a few times...most commonly in medians and other scenarios when I'm in neutral, almost stopped, and ESS and stopped the engine--but not a complete stop with the break fully engaged as it would be at a stop light/sign.
I suppose it could be because of my specific driving style...but it feels very unnerving in the moment when you want/need your vehicle to move and the engine isn't on.
Has anyone else experienced this?
This is not a thread about Global Warming. It's a thread about ESS. That so many here immediately jump on the Global Warming hate train in a thread about ESS tells a sad story.Not sure how there can be discourse about global warming/climate change and avoid politics.
So what you are advocating in this case, is a knee jerk reaction to what may or may not be a human based issue. Never mind that we recently left a mini-ice age, so of course weather is going to be different."You say it's a "FACT" that "nearly all" of the Scientist and climatologist subscribe to the "climate change" theory that they conveniently had to change from "global warming" in a nice slight of hand after we had some of the coldest and longest winters in years."
Regardless of what side you sit on as it regards ESS, Global Warming, if it exists, what is causing it, will ESS help, what we can do about it, how much, and predictions for what it will do to us in the future, nobody but nobody can argue that its metrics are not captured in--assuming it was even the case--the climate data of a few winters.
That's like trying to prove that nature's carving tool: water, can't slice through rock by taking rock thickness measurements at 5 minute intervals, comparing the two, finding no appreciation reduction in the size of the rock and concluding beyond a shadow of a doubt that water hitting rock has no affect on it ever.
I truly hope the poster who said this was trolling. It scares me to think he/she subscribes to their beliefs based on such sampling data.