Doesn’t have to be driven insanely hard to get that. Just a lot of short drives in traffic.
He’s been gone for about 6-7 years now unfortunately. I think he left around 2015-2016 time frame. He was a good dude. Bought my first wrangler from him. Wheeled a few times in Moab with him and his red LJ, too.
Or sit there at idle as they do a dealer pre delivery setup and inspection.
I’m averaging 9.2 mpg right now with all city driving as of recent. Lots of stop and go. To be fair I’m full throttle a lot lol— lots of launches. Not a daily though so when I drive it I really drive hard I suppose. I also have the 4.56 gears.
For sale, getting test drives— yet showing 8.5 MPG , some people clearly don’t know how to take a proper test drive!!
That’s at least 2 MPG too high! 
Hell I think the msrp of $80k is smoking crack.
I did a B&P on a diesel Rubi before ordering the 392 ($77,620 inc shipping) the diesel was about $69K (shipping?)when optioned with all the standard “options “ included on the 392,add cost of a lift (don’t remember if beadlock capable wheels were an option, if not add price) water diverting hood, and a couple other 392 specific items NA, it substantially lessens the “shock” of the 392’s price. Disclaimer—I wouldn’t have gotten some of the “options” if they were not “standard”.Hell I think the msrp of $80k is smoking crack.
I love the 392 engine but not at that price. Id rather buy 2 vehicles for the price of one over 2 extra cylinders. But that's just me.
And after owning several 392 Challengers the 2.0T that's in my Jeep continues to impress me. It's definitely not lacking in power, I average 21mpg and it actually sounds cool. It has it own unique deep pur. And you can hear the turbo spool up all the time.
That seems high for a diesel as well. I guess prices aren't getting any cheaper that's for sure.I did a B&P on a diesel Rubi before ordering the 392 ($77,620 inc shipping) the diesel was about $69K (shipping?)when optioned with all the standard “options “ included on the 392,add cost of a lift (don’t remember if beadlock capable wheels were an option, if not add price) water diverting hood, and a couple other 392 specific items NA, it substantially lessens the “shock” of the 392’s price. Disclaimer—I wouldn’t have gotten some of the “options” if they were not “standard”.
I have the 2.0T and it has impressed me as well. My biggest complaint is the throttle delay and turbo lag. A throttle controller has helped minimally but there is still lag between input, action and then another delay for the turbo. It's pretty annoying IMO. I noticed zero lag in the 392 and obviously that also solves the turbo lag issue.Hell I think the msrp of $80k is smoking crack.
I love the 392 engine but not at that price. Id rather buy 2 vehicles for the price of one over 2 extra cylinders. But that's just me.
And after owning several 392 Challengers the 2.0T that's in my Jeep continues to impress me. It's definitely not lacking in power, I average 21mpg and it actually sounds cool. It has it own unique deep pur. And you can hear the turbo spool up all the time.
There are quite a few dealers offering this. Ordered my 23 for 8.5k off in June of this year. Just search the board.
I recently ordered one for about $7K below MSRP
