bruin1md
Active Member
- Thread starter
- #46
Sounds like your mind’s made up.
If you can afford the 392, then get it. It will be loads of fun. But don’t try to rationalize your purchase thinking that “392 will be better in snow” or any of that, cuz it won’t be.
Just be honest with yourself and get it; it’s okay to have fun.
Good luck!
lol........understood and thanks. I didn't mean it would be better in snow: rather, I would be ok in snow b/c of its full time 4wd platform (coupled with the KO2's).
And actually, my mind isn't made up yet. I really liked the way the the Sahara altitude with eco diesel drove-- more so than the Rubicon with the same engine.
But if I get it, I need to get the 2.0 engine so I can get the Selec Trac to go with it (not offered with the diesel)
I was just curious if you thought the Sahara would be the better option in that it will still be fun (and I was thinking of doing an after market tune, which I'm sure has to be feasible w/o screwing with the warranty), safer in the bad weather with Selec trac c/w the 392 while being a better DD, and of course will save me about $20-25k.
thanks again for your feedback.
Sponsored