- Joined
- Oct 12, 2016
- Threads
- 139
- Messages
- 2,544
- Reaction score
- 2,058
- Location
- Westchester, NY
- Vehicle(s)
- JLU Sahara
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #1
I am not seeking a fight; rather understanding.
What is it that people find so terrible about ESS? This isn't to say that I'm in love with it, but I've never had a situation where I wanted the JL to move quickly from a stopped position, with the engine turned off by ESS, and wasn't able to have that engine turn on and be able to respond before my foot reached the gas pedal. Maybe you have. And maybe with age and a less than tuned engine such issues will crop up eventually.
I would hope that vehicles that have it also have more heavy duty starters to handle the strain on moving parts associated with the additional cranking. But if not, I'd see your point there.
For those who hate it, you have my respect. But what is so difficult about pressing the button to turn it off upon initial engine startup? There's lots of things we do post crank to our rigs, from adjusting the climate, to the radio, to maybe turning on the headlights or wipers. Maybe it's because of all those things that some don't wish yet another post crank task. Maybe you see it as an unnecesary imposition by government: after all it's you paying for the fuel. If so, I respect and appreciate that.
Still more its easy to defeat (ESS that is,) and if you don't like the warning lights that result, there's CANBUS (Tazers/Flashers etc.) product to address it: albeit I respect many of you don't like to have to pay for it.
For those that say that ESS should have been off by default off at startup, I wonder if such a setup would have allowed FCA to qualify for government mandated fuel economy regulations.
For those who think this is government imposing on personal rights, well it is. But there's no debating that such systems on the whole (maybe not for you and me individually) save gas, and reduce pollution. Government imposes a lot of stuff on us. Some I don't like. But things like insisting our kids get their inoculations before attending public school makes not only them safer, but increases the chance they won't infect others, particularly some in the population, due to medical reasons (e.g. Cystic Fibrosis patients), who can't take such shots. I completely get the limits of that analogy as it relates to ESS. I was just showing another example of how government imposes on us, but sometimes with good intentions, and in the case of shots at least: I believe (as do most) good outcomes.
(Autism and shots: not a single clinical piece of evidence to support that.)
As vehicles move to autonomous driving and hybrid or non-combustible propulsion systems, perhaps this issue will become moot. I just have this strange feeling that our kid's generation is going to see a vehicle's engine being on and idling at a stop light as the same degree of wasteful that my parents saw my keeping lights on in unoccupied rooms during the '70s energy crisis I grew up with, that again technology solved with systems that detect room motion or lack thereof to regulate the on/off state of lights.
I respect that some of you may have different thresholds than me as to what constitutes the overreach of government in our lives.
I respect that there's not one way to live life, and my priorities are neither right, nor necessarily yours.
So let's not turn this into a shouting match, but rather informed discussion.
Thanks.
What is it that people find so terrible about ESS? This isn't to say that I'm in love with it, but I've never had a situation where I wanted the JL to move quickly from a stopped position, with the engine turned off by ESS, and wasn't able to have that engine turn on and be able to respond before my foot reached the gas pedal. Maybe you have. And maybe with age and a less than tuned engine such issues will crop up eventually.
I would hope that vehicles that have it also have more heavy duty starters to handle the strain on moving parts associated with the additional cranking. But if not, I'd see your point there.
For those who hate it, you have my respect. But what is so difficult about pressing the button to turn it off upon initial engine startup? There's lots of things we do post crank to our rigs, from adjusting the climate, to the radio, to maybe turning on the headlights or wipers. Maybe it's because of all those things that some don't wish yet another post crank task. Maybe you see it as an unnecesary imposition by government: after all it's you paying for the fuel. If so, I respect and appreciate that.
Still more its easy to defeat (ESS that is,) and if you don't like the warning lights that result, there's CANBUS (Tazers/Flashers etc.) product to address it: albeit I respect many of you don't like to have to pay for it.
For those that say that ESS should have been off by default off at startup, I wonder if such a setup would have allowed FCA to qualify for government mandated fuel economy regulations.
For those who think this is government imposing on personal rights, well it is. But there's no debating that such systems on the whole (maybe not for you and me individually) save gas, and reduce pollution. Government imposes a lot of stuff on us. Some I don't like. But things like insisting our kids get their inoculations before attending public school makes not only them safer, but increases the chance they won't infect others, particularly some in the population, due to medical reasons (e.g. Cystic Fibrosis patients), who can't take such shots. I completely get the limits of that analogy as it relates to ESS. I was just showing another example of how government imposes on us, but sometimes with good intentions, and in the case of shots at least: I believe (as do most) good outcomes.
(Autism and shots: not a single clinical piece of evidence to support that.)
As vehicles move to autonomous driving and hybrid or non-combustible propulsion systems, perhaps this issue will become moot. I just have this strange feeling that our kid's generation is going to see a vehicle's engine being on and idling at a stop light as the same degree of wasteful that my parents saw my keeping lights on in unoccupied rooms during the '70s energy crisis I grew up with, that again technology solved with systems that detect room motion or lack thereof to regulate the on/off state of lights.
I respect that some of you may have different thresholds than me as to what constitutes the overreach of government in our lives.
I respect that there's not one way to live life, and my priorities are neither right, nor necessarily yours.
So let's not turn this into a shouting match, but rather informed discussion.
Thanks.
Sponsored