Matthew/E36
Well-Known Member
I asked for nothing and got nothing beyond the deal, which was 5% below invoice at Koons for a factory order.
I wouldn't want the dealer to say, "hey, could you pay a little more than we bargained for (for example) the larger screen," so I didn't say it to him in reverse.
I'm not blind to the fact that the dealer probably had money to spare in his profit, just as I could have afforded to pay more. I was content knowing that after FCA volume incentives, the dealer clears a couple of $100 in profit from the sale. He has a right to profit. Running a dealership is expensive (as sure as Jim Koons makes lots of money.)
I'm content knowing that the sale went flawlessly. I seek win-win transactions in this world. I'm not blind to the fact that each entity in a deal has a right to do what's best by them within the scope of law and my philosophy may not work for you.
I dislike any aspect of a transaction that seeks to complicate its true terms. Throwing in goodies, failing to negotiate a trade-in independently of a new car sale...not for me. They are classic sales tactics to make a customer feel like they got a good deal and are as transparent as the invariable infomercial product that magically drops the last payment and still makes a profit.
See past them. See everything in net present value--what it costs in today's money, especially lease or loan terms versus the joy it brings you.
So guess I should have asked for money back when I said I didn't want that license plate holder and tire cover!
Sponsored