Sholmberg0311
Well-Known Member
Sahara Gang
Sponsored
I was going to say the same thing. Iāve had both a Sport S and a Rubicon. I bought the Rubicon for off-road reasons, but i was able to put 35s on without a lift or regear. The gears are better than my Sport was with 33s.If you are thinking of putting bigger wheels/tires and are not planning hard off road then go *Rubicon*. I know this is a contrarian opinion here, but here are the reasons:
1 - Rubicon has 4.10 gears which will handle large tires without the need, expense and warranty voiding potential of a regear.
2 - You can fit 35" tires with no lift on a Rubicon for street driving and moderate off-roading (with light loads on the Jeep 1 or 2 people). Again, specially for a lease, you can do that with suspension lifts.
3 - With the Rubicon you can get steel front/rear bumpers from the factory that not only look rugged, they are more rugged than the plastic on the Saharas.
Good luck with your decision, but I think you will be happier with the Rubicon.
Well said Sparty!!!!Do you want to pay for lockers if you aren't going to use them?
Do you want to pay for the electronic swaybar disconnect if you aren't going to use it?
Do you want to pay for the 4:1 transfer case if 4.10 gears if you aren't going to use them?
IMHO, if you're answering no to the above questions, I'd go for the Sahara and throw some Rubicon take-offs on it. Stock Jeeps (and non-Rubicons) are really very capable to begin with
How is a Sport āmore capableā than a Sahara...?Youāre at opposite ends of the spectrum. The Rubi is the most capable and least comfortable Wrangler while the Sahara is the most comfortable and least capable. You can add options to make either more capable or comfortable, but in the end I think youād be happiest with a well equipped Sport S, plus youād have some extra beer money.
I donāt think that argument is being made. I think the poster was comparing Sahara vs. Rubicon, and I chalked it up to poor grammar common on this forum. I think the posterās intention was Sahara and Sport are similar aside from brakes/shocks, and Rubi has the advantages of disconnects, lockers and clearanceā¦but I could be wrong, given the intense Sahara hate that some Rubi owners exhibit.How is a Sport āmore capableā than a Sahara...?
Maybe I shouldnāt have said capable, but it is the least suited. 18ā wheels, painted fenders and plastic side steps all get destroyed pretty quickly with most types of off-roading. If your intention is to have a nice Jeep to drive then the Sahara is a good choice, but if you want to Mod your Jeep into something like a Rubicon a buying Sahara is a waste.How is a Sport āmore capableā than a Sahara...?
I have a modded Sahara that I take on the trails. The only thing Rubicon has I wish my Sahara had is the swaybar disconnect, so I got JKS FlexConnect articulated swaybar links, which is second best.Maybe I shouldnāt have said capable, but it is the least suited. 18ā wheels, painted fenders and plastic side steps all get destroyed pretty quickly with most types of off-roading. If your intention is to have a nice Jeep to drive then the Sahara is a good choice, but if you want to Mod your Jeep into something like a Rubicon a buying Sahara is a waste.