Whaler27
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Alex
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2020
- Threads
- 48
- Messages
- 1,929
- Reaction score
- 3,797
- Location
- Oregon
- Vehicle(s)
- 2019 JL, 2016 Jeep Grand Cherokee Altitude Ecodiesel, 2005 Mustang GT, 2018 Ford Raptor, 2018 BMW R1200GSA, 2020 Honda Monkeybikes (2), 1972 Honda CT-70, 1980 Honda CT-70,
- Occupation
- Saving the world :-)
I have investigated many, many shootings over the last three-plus decades, so I have several lessons to share:Correct, property is not defensible with deadly force, unless your life is also in danger. Physical force maybe, deadly force, no. CO law:
Use of Physical Force in Defense of Property
A person is justified in using reasonable and appropriate physical force upon another person when and to the extent that he or she reasonably believes it necessary to prevent an attempt to commit theft, criminal mischief or criminal tampering involving property, but he may use deadly physical force under these circumstances only in defense of himself or another.
1) Even those who âwinâ in deadly force encounters invariably lose In the years that follow. The experience of shooting another person isnât natural, no matter how many times youâve seen it on TV. The experience lives in your head and it takes a lasting toll that seems to compound over time â even when the justification is a no-brainer, and the person who got shot is a violent asshole with no discernible redeeming value.
2) Being clearly justified is almost irrelevant when it comes to how it will be portrayed/interpreted by the media, which will spin the story to maximize controversy and drama, and many of the new generation of DAs, many of whom are more invested in protecting criminals than protecting their communities. Historically, the non-criminal got the benefit of the doubt, but you canât count on that anymore. Iâve seen kind, mild-mannered, well meaning cops publicly vilified when they did everything right, because the media has an axe to grind and no clue about what is required to survive violent encounters. Many, many times the media has used exculpatory evidence to suggest guilt, and the community at large has bought the narrative.
3) Regardless of what the DA deicides to do with the potential criminal case, there will always be a tort lawyer waiting to step forward and sue the heck out of you. The adorable 1st grade class picture of the career criminal you shot will be shown to the media (and the jury), as his tearful Mom explains what a âgood boyâ he always was. (The Ferguson case jumps to mind).
The old saying âBetter to be judged by twelve than carried by sixâ is still true, but just barely. Iâm well equipped to defend myself, but if push came to shove Iâd let the asshole have my jeep.
Sponsored