stumblinhorse
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #16
Now I need to find somewhere that has toyo at3 35/11.5/17s in stock…
Sponsored
Found this on another forum.I know the 392 comes with Fox shocks and the 392 XR comes with non-Fox shocks. Can someone explain to me what the differences are? Someone in this thread said the shock change was to account for extra weight of the XR package, but aren’t the weight differences only in the tires?
Is the XR version a lesser shock? Why would Jeep charge more for a lesser product?
I have a new 2021 392 XR. I had a 2018 JLR that did not drive at freeway speeds very well. I have read that some 392 owners do not like their handling. Mine is much better than expected has everything but a firm center. I wanted to know is there anything in the XR option that would cause my 392 to handle better than other 392's without XR?The XR package calls out
anyone know what that is?
- 35-Inch Tire Rubicon 392 Suspension
I am shopping for a replacement for the wild peak m/t‘s since I need a snow rated tire for where I live. With my JKUR I went thru a bunch of rubbing with different lifts and tire sizes and I don’t want to go thru that again. I also want to leave my non XR suspension stock. I need to decide between 285/75/17s and 35/11.5/17s size.
I tried to follow what others were doing with my jk and I rubbed like crazy. So is the XR392 more lift than not XR? If they are the same I would feel more comfortable ordering 35s.
I don’t know the answer to your question regarding if something is different with the XR, but I wanted to share that mine is a non-XR 392 that I’ve been extremely happy with how it drives. Even after swapping it to 35s.I have a new 2021 392 XR. I had a 2018 JLR that did not drive at freeway speeds very well. I have read that some 392 owners do not like their handling. Mine is much better than expected has everything but a firm center. I wanted to know is there anything in the XR option that would cause my 392 to handle better than other 392's without XR?
I know the 392 comes with Fox shocks and the 392 XR comes with non-Fox shocks. Can someone explain to me what the differences are? Someone in this thread said the shock change was to account for extra weight of the XR package, but aren’t the weight differences only in the tires?
Is the XR version a lesser shock? Why would Jeep charge more for a lesser product?
I don’t know the answer to your question regarding if something is different with the XR, but I wanted to share that mine is a non-XR 392 that I’ve been extremely happy with how it drives. Even after swapping it to 35s.
Maybe a slight increase in wander with them when I’m driving on an older, unevenly paved road, but that was expected with wheels and tires that are both nearly 2 inches wider than stock.
(315/70 r17 on 17x9 inch wheels)
-Rob
Robb97RRI don’t know the answer to your question regarding if something is different with the XR, but I wanted to share that mine is a non-XR 392 that I’ve been extremely happy with how it drives. Even after swapping it to 35s.
Maybe a slight increase in wander with them when I’m driving on an older, unevenly paved road, but that was expected with wheels and tires that are both nearly 2 inches wider than stock.
(315/70 r17 on 17x9 inch wheels)
-Rob
Mopar builds them?Those are just crappy mopar shocks with fox sticker. They leak and loose rebound just around 13K miles, numbers of forum member including me has experienced that.
I didn't think so either. Maybe he meant built to Mopar specs, dunno. Fox is pretty reputable, but I know these run of shocks have certainly had issues.I don’t believe they build any shocks