EugeneTheJeep
Well-Known Member
So are these things different on a 392 vs non-392 rubi? Or for the diesel?
Sponsored
I think that’s what it is, I’ve heard guys getting a little more lift on their sports/Sahara’s using diesel springs.maybe the extra 1" is what let the jeep sit the same as a non diesel. I was expecting it to be an inch higher overall, but its not for sure. i am looking for my old sheet from my 2019 and my 2020 JLURs to compare. (even have numbers after Mopar lift)
not that i know of.So are these things different on a 392 vs non-392 rubi? Or for the diesel?
If that’s true, then the 392 without the XR package would not fit larger tires any better than the standard Rubi without the XR package if one was interested in taking it off road. But, the OP’s gain in height due to the springs could be combined with bump stop extensions to have the ability to run bigger tires off road, assuming I’m tracking this correctly.not that i know of.
His was a gas, mine is a diesel. I would assume a diesel will be 1/2" lower or so due to added weight. it will be closer to the factory height of the 392 which is a little over 1" higher than a diesel.So the 392 springs would gain you about 1.75” in the front and 1.5” in the rear for a Diesel rubicon?
next time you flex out the front like that grab a pic of the shock to see how much of the shaft is left exposed.The suspension works great. Drove over 150 miles with no problems on the road. Off-roading feel great. Full flex at bump stops no problem. Wanted to mention that the front overall lift gain was 2.75” however, it is really just 2” since I lost 3/4” when with the bumper and winch.
Thanks. I guess with lifts and tire sizes there is no “true” anything. Lifts depend on your added weight to the vehicle and tires are not true 33”, 35” or 37”. My “35s” are just 34s.Looks nice! Since I prefer a true 2" lift, in the future, when prices go down, I will be on the lookout for either a set of these takeoff springs, or a set from the Rubicon XR.
It looks like it has a rake because of the way I took the photo but it doesn’t.Man that looks good! Not sure if i’m tripping but it still seems to have some rake?
I’m still debating 3667ad diesel front springs to even out after the winch, or the full set of diesel springs or a full set of 392 springs though.
I think I posted the measurements here in this thread. I can’t recall right now but they are longer than the stock ones.Did you happen to measure the socks? I have a chance to grab a set but I want to know if they might be too tall for the Rubicon springs.