CarbonSteel
Well-Known Member
The Dana design should be more robust (at least on paper), but there are some things that FCA did to reduce that. They reduced the oil capacity about 1 QT less than previous generations while also reducing the viscosity. These two do not make for a long axle life--particularly if the owner assumes that it is a "lifetime" fill.Everything I've seen is the opposite. These new axles have had constant repairs in line at dealers for nearly three years now. Pinion bearing issues, axle seals leaking, fluid contamination at low mileage, it goes on and on. They're garbage. There's a thread on the JT side of the forum about the rear axles leaking and it adds new pages weekly. It's always on the right hand side, so it's likely a bad casting or production error on the assembly line.
The fact that the fluid gets ruined so quickly tells me that the new metallurgy is poor in the ring and pinion, or the backlash isn't quite right from the factory.
One of the things I did with 200 miles on the odometer is open up the rear vent cap by removing some of the cotton discs from inside. The pressure inside my rear diff can neutralize much more easily now and I'm still protected from water.
The other thing is these axles run hotter than previous generations, which is likely due to the gear teeth design and to some degree the metallurgy. Lastly, the materials used in the LSD discs appear to be substandard and they shed far too much material in normal operation leading to contamination of the oil.
Sponsored
Last edited: