beaups
Well-Known Member
For starters, because 93 isn't available in much of the country. I'm sure jeep would miss selling wranglers in California, for instance.i said this earlier in this thread and will say again.
Jeep is trying everything that they can to squeeze every last MPG out of the cafe standards. If they could show that using 93 octane would get an additional MPG against their CAFE standard, they would require it (Instead of 87). Jeep does not care how much you spend per gallon, they only care what fines they have to pay under CAFE. This would be a HUGE win under CAFE for them..... it could save them many millions....... but, gee..... they haven’t bothered to capture this low hanging fruit. I wonder why?
But, please, educate us all on how much jeep would save under CAFE if the wrangler got 1 more MPG. Then, quantify the impact to sales if they made that move.
I don't think anyone here thinks there's any business sense in paying 20% more for fuel to net a 5% economy gain. But that doesn't mean it isn't possible.
Sponsored