AnnDee4444
Well-Known Member
okFCA is notorious for aggressive torque management (reduction) programs in 1st/2nd gear on ZF platforms. As such, I think the 2.0/3.0 numbers above are extremely optimistic.
Sponsored
okFCA is notorious for aggressive torque management (reduction) programs in 1st/2nd gear on ZF platforms. As such, I think the 2.0/3.0 numbers above are extremely optimistic.
If you're wheeling 95% of the time in 4H then the terrain you think is technical really isn't or you just have no idea what you're doing:Name a terrain and I can just about guarantee you Iāve wheeled it with both the 3.6/6MT and 3.0/8AT...95% of the time the wheel speed in 1st/4H with the 3.0 is plenty slow to control the rig over technical rock. When I do need 4L itās more for the lockers than the lower wheel speed. I honestly expected to need the 4.10 in the 3.0 and have yet to feel the need once. The low-rpm torque of the 392 will likely yield the same experience for the huge majority of folks running less than 40s.
I can't wait to have more money than sense.Someone with more money than sense will buy this,
I hope it's 65K but I'm thinking around 70K to start...max out price 80K.Awesome!! Anybody want to guess the price. I predict $65K
I wouldnāt be surprised if it is just a new sticker to go with the bronze theme, but thought it was worth pointing out in case someone had more details on it. I did check a number of Mopar parts sites and didnāt see anything new available... keeping my eyes peeled though.Any chance they are just re-stickered Mopar 2.5's? Hard to tell from a picture but they don't look any different than mine other than the color. Would be nice to get something similar to what's on the Mojave.
I don't know how you'd add 10k in options. It comes with almost everything unfortunately.I hope it's 65K but I'm thinking around 70K to start...max out price 80K.
You know...there are two ways to balance that equation. Increase money or...I can't wait to have more money than sense.
Itās funny how you donāt wheel a 3.0 on any terrain, let alone what I do in AK, yet your experience is so vastly different than mine and just about everyone who drove it in Utah and had the same feedback about how often they need 4L.If you're wheeling 95% of the time in 4H then the terrain you think is technical really isn't or you just have no idea what you're doing:
You could update your chart with the 3.6 6MT. Drops the 392 another notch.
I could, but you would still have issues with whatever I post. Do the math yourself.You could update your chart with the 3.6 6MT. Drops the 392 another notch.
I'm going with door #3 Alex. I'll just keep doing both so I can prove him wrong.You know...there are two ways to balance that equation. Increase money or...
I actually appreciate your posts and the mathematical approach you take. Was just adding some context and possible data points. Sorry for whatever butt-hurt I inflicted, wasnāt intentional.I could, but you would still have issues with whatever I post. Do the math yourself.
The motor has 0 effect on crawl ratio.Itās funny how you donāt wheel a 3.0 on any terrain, let alone what I do in AK, yet your experience is so vastly different than mine and just about everyone who drove it in Utah and had the same feedback about how often they need 4L.
No butt-hurt here.I actually appreciate your posts and the mathematical approach you take. Was just adding some context and possible data points. Sorry for whatever butt-hurt I inflicted, wasnāt intentional.