I don't disagree with anything you said, I am merely stating that Scotty Kilmer is not and should not be used as proof for anything other than someone who shouts at the camera for YouTube ratings. Even the titles of his videos are so over the top they are offputting."An inline-4 has less probability of reliability issues as there is less frictional loss which can cause problems such as overheating and head gasket problems (see above). A V6 engine has poor primary and secondary balance, and requires extensive use of balance shafts and harmonic damping which sap ultimate engine power. "
take that statement as you wish. I don't think it is irrational to say that an inline 4 cylinder engine Is statistically more reliable than a V6. And that a V6 naturally aspirated engine that's been out for a while is statistically more reliable than a turbocharged engine, since there is no turbocharger.
That is all I am saying. Statistically speaking, all proven technology will be more reliable. I mean that's just reliability 101.
That doesn't mean the V6 on the Wrangler is more reliable than the 4 cyl Turbo. In fact the 4 cyl turbo could be more reliable. I went with the V6 to theoretically reduce my probabilities of early engine costs/issues.