No we definitely will not. You need to understand how EV’s are built and the challenges they face.
It gets 1.3 miles per kwh.
In my opinion no they are not moving too fast. However places completely banning ICE are probably moving too fast. My guess is the infrastructure may lag slightly behind, but that is because they aren't going to invest in it until there is an actual need for it. As EV demands increase there will be improvements to the infrastructure as long as government doesn't get in the way. As for the cost of charging, most of what I have seen shows it is cheaper on electric today, of course that depends on where/when you charge. The interesting thing to watch is how much does electric increase in cost as demands increases as well as what other forms of taxes are implemented to replace the gas tax losses. It is very possible that EVs become more expensive to fuel than gas, especially as gas demand drops. For some people benefit is convenience of charging at home and the potential to use solar, which may make it worth it.
They can’t!
If it was an item more in demand, it would happen on other brands. It's a small market for removable doors, and in the category that it looks like the Recon will be playing, most manufacturers have a panoramic power glass roof that retracts for the open air experience. Those type of customers want the convenience of all power everything, without the muss and fuss of having to remove things. Both Ford and Jeep are playing in the NHTSA side impact protection exemption zone by offering removable doors. Other manufacturers don't.
Some states have rolling black/brownouts on hot days because of increased energy use, you think that's not a good case to upgrade already? That's without even more saturation from forcing people to go EV. We need infrastructure first, not going to work because you couldn't charge your car isn't going to go well I would think. It also takes a lot more work and time to upgrade every end of our grid, which is needed yesterday, not tomorrow.
