Search results

I thought the same thing . Was told it would void warranty.

Apologies if this is not the right forum but feel it should be highlighted as I feel this is becoming a more common occurrence. My 392 was stolen today from my office in Houston, TX. Another individual in my neighborhood had his stolen from the Houston rodeo a few months ago. Pics below for...

Not to bust your excitement but that is normal when dealing with a reputable dealership. Now the fun part begins…. waiting for it to arrive which is lottery. Congrats on your new purchase.

Appreciate all the information here. I too plan on installing albeit hiring someone based on this thread. Any idea on a reasonable labor charge from a respectable shop? I’m going without the tire carrier. Per AEV “ If you do want to use the AEV Rear Bumper without our tire carrier, you will...

This is on their web-site. “If you do want to use the AEV Rear Bumper without our tire carrier, you will need some sort of relocation kit to move the spare tire up and away from the bumper, such as the Mopar 82215355 spare tire relocation kit.”

Checking in on updates for the 392. Thanks!

Magnaflow is working on one as well. Will be curious to hear sound comparisons (stock, AWE, Borla S and Magnas).

Any updates on a release date?

Jeep chat says I'm in trim stage "G" 808200. My dealer said my ship date would be 11/19 a few weeks ago.

Video of a 392 XR ….not the best and not sure they even know it’s an XR but worth a post.

Video of a 392 XR ….not the best and not sure they even know it’s an XR but worth a post.

Checked with my dealer. Was in D last week and as of today in D1 with a 10/18 ship date. 808200 392 XR. I did escalate last week with Jeep chat. Ordered 7/10.

This is what I mentioned in my previous post on this thread. It has been verified by more than a few sources that would know more than us.

The 392 XR comes with an extra vacuum brake booster that is not on the standard 392. Another little nugget Scott Blum dropped on a Facebook group.

I don’t disagree. I think it has to do with uconnect 4. Think about it like an old tv with one hdmi input. You use to have to unplug your cable box and plug in say your PlayStation. I think that’s the issue here.

That was my logic as well. This came from an FCA rep.

It’s my understanding that if you add the front camera this now becomes the default hi res and the back up is downgraded as the system cannot run two hi res cameras. Apparently this will be solved with U5.

the more positive offset the less poke. Stock is around +44 so the + 25 would be the best. There are pics in this thread showing the +25 offset.

I’m not sure about the rubicon xr situation but it was confirmed that the 392 XR would sit at the same height as a 392 with 35’s. Same suspension height with tires changing the ride height.

What type of paint did you use? Any issues with smell/off-gas?