Search results

I ordered a Dodge Challenger, waiting to be shipped. When I go to the Mopar owner page it tells me it is Snazzberry. Maybe Dodge ran out of Octane Red..

Reading the 2020 will offer a 2.0 Turbo without the EcoTorque. Lot less to go wrong or catch on fire. It will have the stop/start feature though.

Wings are typically bolted on, spar through fuselage. Air frames tend to be riveted as well, not welded. Perhaps the answer to all of Jeeps problems is using bolts and rivets.

I lost some interest in Diesels when DEF became necessary. A VW Passat Wagon at >40mpg when Diesel cost less than gasoline, those days are gone.

In eight years it should cost a couple hundred at best, if that.

Better not get in an airplane. If you think a manual option to operate a power window adds complexity, you have not even a basic clue of engineering. Many cars with power moon roof, have manual process too.

The Swamp..

Cool.. I mean if you have a 2.0 Turbo and have had no problems, then of course why wouldn't people like it. But: From a design stand point, I just disagree defending all the cooling lines, 48v battery etc. for negligible return vs all the cost and yes, potential failure. I love new...

It's not over everyone's head. What nerve was it that was hit?

Classic Endowment Effect: ""In a valuation paradigm, people will tend to pay more to retain something they own than to obtain something they do not own—even when there is no cause for attachment, or even if the item was only obtained minutes ago. In an exchange paradigm, people given a good are...

I wouldn't touch one. This is suppose to be an off road vehicle? Look at the plethora of plumbing and wiring attached to undercarriage. Crazy stuff when you can get a different engine without all these points of failure

Have a part # ? This shows JL shocks https://www.moparfactoryparts.com/

What the ^&%$& ? Is Jeep now an arm of the Federal Government?

I'd favor the 3.6L on 87 octane usage alone. I read the 2.0L specifies 91 octane, so factor that cost in to MPG as well.

On the bright side, you haven't run in to half a dozen more issues by actually possessing and driving it.

i sincerely do and appreciate your and others incite to this vehicle. Again, many things I read are echoed, and this is probably quite an unremarkable slice of owners being able to vent here. This reminds me of American car troubles in the 1970's when near all American manufacturers built cars...

Honestly, I'm trying hard in this forum to find any issue the Jeep doesn't have. Nearly every problem mentioned is sustained by more members.

Performance, aka Horse Power. There is plenty HP on 87 octane in the EcoBoost for 99% of drivers.. It does not add MPG or is better for engine, all myths. The Higher octane will let the timing advance a bit, which gets you some Horse Power. It's a shame the 2.0 4cyl turbo engine specifies 91...

If they state to run premium in the 2.0, then it is what it is. I don't understand why FCA would tune an engine that needs anything but 87 with today's technology. My truck has twin turbos and does the 1/4 mile stock in 13.7 , with 87 octane (as specified). People reporting the V6 is rated...