I know this is speculation, but would the adaptive cruise option with the collision alert have stopped the car? My kids now drive, so thinking about safety for them...
This isnt my rig... planning on ordering a hella yella 2019. I think this is the Roam Running Board. I agree, this is probably the best looking step and includes lights. There is another thread on installing these.
C&D 0-60 times were 6.5 for the 2.0 and 6.8 for the 3.6. They liked how the BSG helps off the line response and "effortless thrust". I test drove JLURs with 2.0 and 3.6 back to back. The 2.0 did have more pep, but it wasnt a huge difference. I noticed it the most with passing acceleration...
I am considering ordering this way, especially since the fenders can get banged up. I can find pics either, but here is one in white configured that way.
Agreed. I was excited to order the 2.0T, but seeing the "mile of hoses" and where the battery is located, I worry about off-roading with this. This is looking like a more fragile set-up than the 3.6. Am I being paranoid?
FYI, I test drove another JLUR, and the highway drive was much more stable that my first go. I was able to take my hands off the wheel and the car tracked relatively straight (pulled to right a little). I know this is little consolation for those of you who bought affected cars, but for those...
I went to test drive a JLUR and noticed the drifting and constant corrections needed on the highway immediately. Being a newbie, I chalked this up to how a JLUR drives and hit the pause on buying one. Then, I found this thread... My question is whether this problem is true on all JLs or is this...
Rather than trying to replicate a rubicon, how would you build up a sport or S into something as or more capable off road than a rubicon for around the same ending cost with parts with the mopar catalogue (avoiding opening up to all the third party mods)? We could forgo hood, interior...