Search results

Begs the question: Which came first, the duck or the ducking?

That's on you. I still drive mine everyday and charge it twice a day during the week. The recall, just like the others, is an overblown CYA until they develop a software update.

I did, it is a typical political smoke show that can easily be preempted by federal law in a variety of ways. Stellantis has multiple options for unilateral termination, and could always simply pay some damages should they decide it is worth it to ignore. Also, most of it only covers through...

Regulation of interstate commerce is an enumerated power of Congress (for this exact reason). Article I, Section 8, Clause 3.

Such Legal agreements would be overridden by a change in Federal law that disallows states from making their own rules. CA would have no way to enforce it as compliance would be rendered impossible. I also wonder what the consideration was for such an agreement.

They aren't going to engineer a JL frame for a new power plant for one year of sales. The only likely change to the JL at this point is the electrified version of the 3.6 that they mentioned a while back. I could see them possibly going with the 5.7 once the 392 is done, but I wouldnt call it...

Some of them (Terraflex, Metalcloak, AEV) have options for the different engines, presumably to adjust which springs are used, which makes sense at that is the biggest factor in weight and weight distribution. Spring rates make a big difference in performance across different trims, which...

Not updating the Wrangler is a bigger risk than updating it. The designs for the next GEN are well underway, and I guarantee they have a contingency for ICE options. We know it was going to include an REPB option, which means it has an ICE bay. The auto industry actually got a lot of clarity...

A. It was emails, not a call. B. I didn't (and still don't) know the answer - there is an "if" in my post you quoted that remains an unknown variable.

Hurricane: 430 lbs for the standard output (SO) and 441 lbs for the high output (HO) 392: 500+ lbs.

Never said the I-6 would fit - only that the 2.0 is NOT "cramped" in that engine bay.

Kinda answered your own question there. Point being, I was asking specifically about the impact on the 4xe, but the response was incorrect information about the very basic facts regarding different trim levels. I was asking because if 4xe Sports are getting 1.5" of lift, it seems likely that...

An "afterthought" two years in the making (the font and flag placement are just like the 2022 concept).

I know that, you know that, why don't they know that? Also, the 4xe throws yet another variable into the mix.

I messaged one of the lift kit providers to ask about how one of their kits impacts the lift on a 4xe Rubicon. This particular provider seems to use one-size-fits -all springs, but said that their springs produce a certain lift for the 4xe, so I was asking about which version that applies to...

First the angry grill, now the stoner grill.

Look again from underneath, there is a TON of space between the engine and the radiator in the 2.0. It still may not be enough for the I-6, but "cramped" is not a way to describe it.

So the switch to all-EV would happen faster?

Jeep in North America is where they get all of their profit, and the I-6 was developed to be produced well into the 2030s. Trust me, they had a contingency plan for an administration that would let them make money, and put-off EV mandates in the US. It will also help fix their labor problems...