Is the goal of pushing electric vehicles to sell a lot of units or to have a measurable impact on the environment?
If it’s to sell as many units as possible then you are correct, they’ve been successful but if the goal is to have a measurable impact on the environment there are independent...
I guess we like forced child labor, environmentally disastrous mining techniques and worse carbon footprints over the normal life of a vehicle vs. a rock solid 3.6NA gasser or a 3.0L TT.
We aren't "saving" anything by going full electric but our kids and grandkids can worry about that.
I believe the non-etorque model is only available on the 6spd manual though so consider your own personal use case and preference, but you can also order the 3.6L etorque with the 4.88 gears for only $895 which would be a great setup for 37/38s if you plan to go that route.
Question for the happy diesel owners in the thread.
If you had to order a new Jeep today and couldn’t get the diesel what would you order? I had a 2019 3.6 that was great and I’d do a diesel in the spring if I can still find a new one but assuming I don’t I’m thinking the 2.0T next.
Yes sir. I should have been more clear. I’m wondering why the 4.88s are only available from the factory with the 3.6L. Just think it would be a sweet package with the 2.0T as a special order. Thx
On my phone so not looking up a bunch of links but the models are:
Vision Nemesis, Se7en and Creep
Mopar is the Mopar Beadlock with simulated Beadlock ring
Dirty Life DT-1 and DT-2
KMC GRS
Teraflex Nomad Standard and Split Spoke
Looks perfect and thanks for the visual. I'll chop the fenders and add inner fender liners as well so that plus I live in Florida where its pretty tame wheelin' should be no issues. I'd go 3.5 " but my 2019 JLUR with 2.5" and 37s leaves me about 1.5" clearance for the garage, and I'm worried...
Similar question for @Clayton Off Road but more specific. I want to run your 2.5" Overland+ on a 2023 JLU Rubicon with Nitto 38s and will have wheels with the proper backspacing.