Sponsored

What Are The Largest Tires I Can Safely Run On BUILT Factory D44s?

rkwfxd

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rich
Joined
May 24, 2021
Threads
37
Messages
1,117
Reaction score
2,115
Location
Whittier
Vehicle(s)
2021 JLR, 2020 Tahoe 4x4, 2006 Tundra, 1990 964
Occupation
Unemployed
Hi All,

What is the general consensus or thoughts on running larger tires on BUILT factory D44s? Built as in Artec Truss Front and rear, RCV Axles front and rear, Reid Racing Knuckles, HD Ball Joints or Ball Joint Eliminators, HD TireRod, Ends and Pitman Arm, 5.13:1 Gears but keeping all of the factory fancy shmancy stuff like factory electric lockers, front axle disconnect and swaybar disconnect.

Trails are Big Bear - Holcomb, JB, GM, Cougar Buttes, Shaver / Dusy, Rubicon but in a 21 2 dr with the 2.0T and a light throttle. I don't always need to take the hardest line.
Sponsored

 
  • Like
Reactions: J0E

bjm00se

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Jan 26, 2021
Threads
7
Messages
1,302
Reaction score
3,109
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
JLUR 6sp ordered 11/3/21, picked up 8/30/22
I pondered the same thing. You can dig up a bunch of threads on this forum and elsewhere, not to mention stuff you'll find on youtube.

The "consensus" answer - which is what you asked for - seems to be 37"

Now, despite that, a number of folks seem to be driving around wheeling the p**s out of their Jeeps on 39" tires. 😝

It's also true that, just as the Jeep can do more than folks tend to expect on stock 33" tires, a capably driven Jeep can also do a lot more than you expect while rolling on 37" tires.

I had a long conversation with my local off-road shop about my usage and my budget, and we landed on 37" tires, even though I'd gone in with the expectation of using 39s.

Your mileage, measured both in mpg, and axle-breaks-per-mile, may vary.
 
OP
OP
rkwfxd

rkwfxd

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rich
Joined
May 24, 2021
Threads
37
Messages
1,117
Reaction score
2,115
Location
Whittier
Vehicle(s)
2021 JLR, 2020 Tahoe 4x4, 2006 Tundra, 1990 964
Occupation
Unemployed
I know a lot of folks are running 37s on bone stock D44s and that of course is still an option.

Im currently on a 2.5" MC GC lift with 315 BFG KM3s. I will for sure go up to 37's on my next tire(s) but the possibility of 39s/40s is kind of / sort of in the back on my mind.

I work from home so while my jeep is technically a DD, I rarely drive it more than 5 miles round trip for errands. MPG on wheeling trips does not matter for me. Especially for long weekends when I flat tow it.

I like to wheel a rig that is a bit over built and more capable than my comfort zone so that I DON'T have issues on the trail.

I ran a TJ on 35s with a locked but stock D30 and bent on axle u-joint ear on one trip one time (but did not realize it until the post trip garage inspection) so overall I think I am fairly easy on my junk.

The JL is just so much more capable and I find myself taking harder lines, I don't want to create mechanical issues for myself (or others in my group) while on a run.
 

Sponsored

MSparks909

Well-Known Member
First Name
Miles
Joined
May 6, 2021
Threads
15
Messages
695
Reaction score
1,312
Location
NC
Vehicle(s)
JLU Rubicon 3.0
I’d feel comfortable on built D44s with 38s and the 2.0T. The new 38” Nitto’s would be my choice. You *can* run 39s/40s on built D44s but with the 5.13s I’d worry about pinion strength/reliability over the long haul.
 

SouthValleyPerformance

Active Member
First Name
JD
Joined
May 19, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
35
Reaction score
45
Location
Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2022? Rubicon
I know a lot of folks are running 37s on bone stock D44s and that of course is still an option.

Im currently on a 2.5" MC GC lift with 315 BFG KM3s. I will for sure go up to 37's on my next tire(s) but the possibility of 39s/40s is kind of / sort of in the back on my mind.

I work from home so while my jeep is technically a DD, I rarely drive it more than 5 miles round trip for errands. MPG on wheeling trips does not matter for me. Especially for long weekends when I flat tow it.

I like to wheel a rig that is a bit over built and more capable than my comfort zone so that I DON'T have issues on the trail.

I ran a TJ on 35s with a locked but stock D30 and bent on axle u-joint ear on one trip one time (but did not realize it until the post trip garage inspection) so overall I think I am fairly easy on my junk.

The JL is just so much more capable and I find myself taking harder lines, I don't want to create mechanical issues for myself (or others in my group) while on a run.
Any concern that if you overbuild it that might tempt you to overdo it?
 

Sponsored

jessedacri

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jesse
Joined
Aug 23, 2019
Threads
30
Messages
1,095
Reaction score
1,885
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Vehicle(s)
2019 Bright White 2dr JL Rubicon 3.6
You can do all those trails in a JLR on 35s for sure and pretty comfortably too, I've done most of them myself aside from Dusy and the Rubicon but hopefully that changes soon. 37s are IMO as big as I'd realistically go on a 2 door but I think you could likely go 39s "safely" if you drive like you're aware your wheels and tires weigh 140lbs each. IMO 37s give you the "over built" feeling in a 2 door the same way 39-40s do in a 4-door.

I know Tyler thejladventure runs 39s with no trusses and he wheels often but I think he's very skilled on the throttle and wheels with the rig in mind, all things considered. He's always had big setups on basically-stock axles and gotten away with it. The stock axles are strong *except* for the cast FAD housing but with a truss they're tough.

For me I think the gearing and general performance would start to become suboptimal for my tastes beyond 37s. I don't want to run a technically weaker 5.13 ring and pinion, and I know my 4.88s will start feeling undergeared beyond 37, especially with my 3.6. That extra rolling mass adds up fast.
 
OP
OP
rkwfxd

rkwfxd

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rich
Joined
May 24, 2021
Threads
37
Messages
1,117
Reaction score
2,115
Location
Whittier
Vehicle(s)
2021 JLR, 2020 Tahoe 4x4, 2006 Tundra, 1990 964
Occupation
Unemployed
OP
OP
rkwfxd

rkwfxd

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rich
Joined
May 24, 2021
Threads
37
Messages
1,117
Reaction score
2,115
Location
Whittier
Vehicle(s)
2021 JLR, 2020 Tahoe 4x4, 2006 Tundra, 1990 964
Occupation
Unemployed
You can do all those trails in a JLR on 35s for sure and pretty comfortably too, I've done most of them myself aside from Dusy and the Rubicon but hopefully that changes soon. 37s are IMO as big as I'd realistically go on a 2 door but I think you could likely go 39s "safely" if you drive like you're aware your wheels and tires weigh 140lbs each. IMO 37s give you the "over built" feeling in a 2 door the same way 39-40s do in a 4-door.

I know Tyler thejladventure runs 39s with no trusses and he wheels often but I think he's very skilled on the throttle and wheels with the rig in mind, all things considered. He's always had big setups on basically-stock axles and gotten away with it. The stock axles are strong *except* for the cast FAD housing but with a truss they're tough.

For me I think the gearing and general performance would start to become suboptimal for my tastes beyond 37s. I don't want to run a technically weaker 5.13 ring and pinion, and I know my 4.88s will start feeling undergeared beyond 37, especially with my 3.6. That extra rolling mass adds up fast.
Really great points in your response. Thank you.

I just did a 5 tire rotation and the weight of anything over 37s might be enough to steer me away from them.

37s are prob enough to do any trail I want and as you pointed out, make other things easier/better. 4.88s would be enough AND stronger. Axle upgrades become less urgent as well. Easier to get in and out etc….
 

rcr1340

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Nov 30, 2017
Threads
31
Messages
261
Reaction score
140
Location
Spring Hill Florida
Vehicle(s)
2005 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon(LJ)
Occupation
retail manager
Check out "Rock Ballerina" on YouTube. 5.38 gears, built 44s, 40s. Been running that for 40k miles
 

word302

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2017
Threads
11
Messages
5,146
Reaction score
5,718
Location
Oregon
Vehicle(s)
JLU
Really great points in your response. Thank you.

I just did a 5 tire rotation and the weight of anything over 37s might be enough to steer me away from them.

37s are prob enough to do any trail I want and as you pointed out, make other things easier/better. 4.88s would be enough AND stronger. Axle upgrades become less urgent as well. Easier to get in and out etc….
Another thing to think about: you spend all that money to upgrade the factory axles and then blow a ring and pinion. Do you dump more money replacing the weak link, knowing you could do it again? If you plan to go bigger than 37s I wouldn’t dump much money into the stock axles. I’d save that money for a one ton fund. There’s plenty of discussions on this in the axle forum.
Sponsored

 
 



Top