DanW
Well-Known Member
And CF has something to gain. And they appear to be on strike 2, with their second revision. They also claim every factory clutch is weak compared to theirs, so no news flash there. I'm sure they make good clutches, but that doesn't make the factory clutçhes inadequate.Nah... I stand by my statement, backed up BTW by the folks at CF who confirmed to me that the slave cylinder plays no role in these failures, however rare they are. Common sense tells you that if the original recall solved the issue there would be no need for the nannycam firmware of the current recall.
I like my MT jeep, that is why I ponied up the extra $ for the CF clutch: It's well-engineered and never a worry about my jeep becoming an IED.
Common sense tells me the 2nd recall is a simple and cheap insurance policy. A safety feature that would have likely prevented the two catastrophic failures.
Sponsored
Last edited: