Sponsored

Composite bed

Would you like a composite bed in the new JT

  • Yes

    Votes: 7 58.3%
  • No

    Votes: 5 41.7%

  • Total voters
    12
Status
Not open for further replies.

NewApexJT

Member
First Name
Andrew
Joined
Jun 14, 2017
Threads
1
Messages
19
Reaction score
16
Location
Newmarket Ontario
Vehicle(s)
2008 Ford Ranger, 2018 Nissan Frontier
Occupation
Mechanical Engineer
Is anyone hoping that the JT will get a composite bed something like the Tacoma. I recently went camping using a friends Tacoma and I was impressed on how the bed has held up (the truck was abused more than average and is getting up their in age). Would the lighter material and no need for a bedliner be suited for the JT or would a traditional seek bed be wanted?
Sponsored

 

The Great Grape Ape

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2017
Threads
9
Messages
2,840
Reaction score
4,122
Location
Canadian Rockies
Vehicle(s)
2015 JKU AspenX 5spd , 2015 JK Sport 6spd
Composite bed is nice if built on a good structure and ontop of a good framework and integrate it well into the 'non-composit' stuff.
It's usually slightly more expensive than a steel bed, but also cheaper than an Aluminium one (especially if you don't already work extensively in Alu). Also quality control is slightly harder as composite hides imprefections more.

There are only a few drawback, that they are a little easier to damage than steel (though likely more resilient than Alu in many ways), they cannot be reinforced like steel beds (but that's usually for proffesional trucks), and since you're in 'kinda cold' area , but might travel up 11 or the 400 to colder climes, then the possibility of the bed cracking, especially along seamlines, is real.. but rare.
However if you though Alu repairs were a pain and expensive that's nothing compared to composite, which usually ends up being a replace, not a repair even for a proeffesional body shop.

It would be a pretty good fit for the JT since it's a 'play/fun' truck not a 'work' truck and a lighter bed/box would help the Wrangler's biggest issue in weight, and also give back a few pounds for payload and towing too (the amount of which would matter more for the former than the latter).

Of course the reason Toyota introduced them was to help get rid of their 'Rusty Yota' image due to the major rust issues with the Tacos and Tundras, and with Ford and GM having incorporated composite at many varying levels (including boxes like the Protec) to varying degrees of success a few years before, it was the logical next step for Toyota.
 

Ian cj10

Well-Known Member
First Name
ian
Joined
Aug 12, 2017
Threads
0
Messages
47
Reaction score
8
Location
australia
Vehicle(s)
1984 cj10 pickup ,1983 sj cherokee with 6.2l chev diesel
im sure they will get used & abused so i think if they use steel it would be more practical
im hoping to buy 1 when they finally reach our shores & if the bed isnt up to the job ill have to put a trayback on it instead
cheers ian
 

WXman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2017
Threads
61
Messages
2,856
Reaction score
3,078
Location
Central Kentucky
Vehicle(s)
2018 Wrangler Unlimited
Occupation
Meteorology and Transportation
Remember, Toyota had issues with their beds cracking in cold weather. Did they ever get that solved?
 

Vegas_Sirk

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2016
Threads
21
Messages
805
Reaction score
456
Location
Boise, ID
Vehicle(s)
2013 JKU
Vehicle Showcase
1
The AEV brute's bed was composite, so I wouldn't be surprised to see FCA use one.
Sponsored

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 



Top